AI Hallucination Cases
US courts are deciding AI hallucination and sanctions cases at an accelerating pace. This tracker publishes a canonical reference page per case, verified against primary sources, with links to dockets, orders, and the related state bar rules or court standing orders that apply.
Covers monetary sanctions, bar discipline referrals, disqualifications, license suspensions, pro hac vice revocations, and pending cases where the appellate court has not yet ruled.
Malpractice carriers treat AI hallucination cases as a rising risk signal at renewal. Documented AI
governance policies are the primary defense. See For Carriers for what
carriers require.
| Case | Court | Date | AI Tool | Outcome | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mata v. Avianca, Inc. | S.D.N.Y. | Jun 2023 | ChatGPT | Court sanction | $5,000 |
Cases verified against court records and published orders. More cases being added weekly — join the waitlist to get notified when new cases are published.