June 1, 2026 (in 3 days): New York: 22 NYCRR Part 161 takes effect, system-wide AI policy for all UCS courts

In re Troylond Malon Wise

U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette Division · Bankr. W.D. La. · Louisiana bar guidance

Court sanction

Verified April 26, 2026

Citation
In re Wise, No. 25-51132 (Bankr. W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2026) (ECF No. 84)
Decided
April 9, 2026

Summary

Debtor's counsel Kathleen M. Wilson admitted using generative AI to draft an Objection and Supplemental Response to a Motion for Relief from Stay in a Chapter 13 case. The pleadings cited a nonexistent case (In re Buttermilk Towne LLC), misused another (In re Garcia, with no cite), and invoked La. R.S. section 9:5774, a Louisiana statute that does not exist. Judge John W. Kolwe found a Rule 9011(b)(2) violation and concluded that Wilson's failure to verify AI-generated content caused her to file false and misleading pleadings.

AI tool:
Unspecified generative AI
Sanction amount:
$2,750
This case summary is informational only. Verify the underlying opinion or order against the primary source before relying on it in any filing or client matter.

What sanction did the court impose?

$2,750 monetary sanction payable to the Clerk within ten days; six hours of in-person CLE on AI in legal practice required (including one hour of ethics and one hour of professionalism); Wilson barred from filing or participating in any new bankruptcy case in the Western District of Louisiana until both the payment and CLE proof are submitted; the Objection, Supplemental Response, and Corrected Supplemental Response all stricken.

Why does In re Troylond Malon Wise matter for law firms using AI?

In re Wise is among the first published bankruptcy court sanctions orders in the Fifth Circuit addressing generative AI hallucinations, and the court explicitly treated it as a matter of first impression and a warning shot. The conditional practice bar, withholding the right to file new cases in the district until CLE and payment are verified, is a meaningful escalation beyond a flat fine, and firms whose attorneys handle bankruptcy work in W.D. La. should treat unverified AI-assisted citations as a docket-access risk, not just a malpractice risk.

Sources

Further reading

Source PDF is a Westlaw printout mirrored from the Damien Charlotin hallucination database. We are working to add the underlying court docket (PACER, CourtListener, or court website) as a second source.