October 18, 2026 (in 16 days): Tenth Circuit: comments close on 2027 rules, incl. proposed Rule 46.5(B)(4) generative-AI review →

Hays County, Texas (County Courts at Law, probate and guardianship proceedings): Administ…

Judges Jimmy Alan Hall (County Court at Law No. 1), Chris Johnson (County Court at Law No. 2) and Elaine S. Brown (County Court at Law No. 3) · County Courts at Law Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of Hays County, Texas

active

Verified October 1, 2026

Citation
Administrative Order Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings, No. O-12-005 (County Courts at Law of Hays County, Texas)
Order date
August 25, 2026

Summary

The order applies to 'all attorneys, personal representatives, guardians, applicants, and pro se litigants appearing before the Hays County Courts at Law in probate and guardianship proceedings.'

What does the order require?

Practice areas: state probate

Verify this order against the court's official website before relying on it. Standing orders are amended without notice. Requirements vary by judge and case type.

What the order requires

The three County Court at Law judges of Hays County signed Administrative Order O-12-005, Administrative Order Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings (Hays Cnty. Cts. at Law Aug. 25, 2026). Citing the courts’ “affirmative obligation to safeguard the integrity of proceedings involving decedents’ estates” and guardianships, it applies to “all attorneys, personal representatives, guardians, applicants, and pro se litigants appearing before the Hays County Courts at Law in probate and guardianship proceedings.”

Any “motion, brief, response, objection, inventory, account, proposed order, or other legal instrument” drafted, composed, or generated in whole or in part with generative AI or automated drafting tools “must include a prominent AI Disclosure Statement,” placed immediately before the signature block. The statement certifies that generative AI was used and “that every citation, factual representation, quotation, and statutory reference generated with AI assistance has been independently verified for accuracy, authenticity, and applicability by human review.”

The order describes a “non-delegable duty of human verification”: the filer remains personally responsible for verifying that case citations exist and reflect current, unreversed precedent, confirming statute and rule citations, and protecting confidential information. Filing fictitious case law, fabricated references, or failing to disclose generative AI use may result in striking the filing, disallowance or reduction of attorney’s fees, monetary sanctions under TRCP 13 or Chapter 10 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, or contempt or referral to the State Bar of Texas Chief Disciplinary Counsel.

Posting

The order states, in capital letters, that it becomes effective immediately upon publication on the Office of Court Administration’s website, consistent with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 3a(c). The OCA local-rules portal lists it as posted August 25, 2026.

Local Rule 1.07 of the same courts requires a written verification certification in all cases.

Primary source

Administrative Order O-12-005 (scanned PDF), OCA local-rules portal