October 18, 2026 (in 16 days): Tenth Circuit: comments close on 2027 rules, incl. proposed Rule 46.5(B)(4) generative-AI review →

D. Colo.: Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence ("AI") i…

Hon. N. Reid Neureiter, U.S. Magistrate Judge · U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

active

Verified September 30, 2026

Citation
Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence ("AI") in Court Filings (Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter, D. Colo.)
Order date
September 22, 2026

Summary

'In cases before this court in which the parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, every filing shall contain an AI Certification regarding the use, or non-use, of generative AI (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Gemini) in preparing the filing, signed by all individuals who contributed to the drafting of the filing.'

What does the order require?

Practice areas: federal civil

Verify this order against the court's official website before relying on it. Standing orders are amended without notice. Requirements vary by judge and case type.

What the order requires

Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter’s Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in Court Filings took effect September 22, 2026. In cases where the parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, “every filing shall contain an AI Certification regarding the use, or non-use, of generative AI (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Gemini) in preparing the filing, signed by all individuals who contributed to the drafting of the filing.”

Where generative AI was used, “each individual must certify that any language drafted by AI (even if later edited by a human) was personally reviewed by the filer or another human for accuracy and that all legal citations reference actual non-fictitious cases or cited authority.” In cases referred to him, the order “applies only to opposed motions that are referred to this court.”

Consequences

“The court will strike any filing that does not comply with the AI Certification requirements described above.” The order adds a fee-shifting signal: because an AI filing “can be generated with little to no cost or time expenditure but still impose significant costs,” the court “will consider awarding attorney fees to the opposing party where it appears that a filing using generative AI lacked substantial justification.” All filings remain subject to Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. section 1927, and applicable ethical rules.

The certification text closely follows Judge Nina Y. Wang’s standing order (effective December 1, 2025), and the order encourages counsel and parties to review Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell’s guidance on AI hallucinations. The District of Colorado has no district-wide AI rule, so requirements vary by judicial officer.

Primary source

Standing order, effective September 22, 2026 (PDF); Magistrate Judge Neureiter’s chambers page