October 18, 2026 (in 9 days): Tenth Circuit: comments close on 2027 rules, incl. proposed Rule 46.5(B)(4) generative-AI review →

S.D.N.Y.: Individual Rules: Generative AI Declaration (Civil § 1.f, Criminal § 1.e, Civil…

Judge Dale E. Ho · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

active

Verified September 30, 2026

Citation
Individual Rules: Generative AI Declaration (Civil § 1.f, Criminal § 1.e, Civil Pro Se § 8; Cases Assigned to Judge Ho)
Order date
January 8, 2026

Summary

Any party who uses generative AI (such as ChatGPT, Harvey, CoCounsel, or Google Bard) to generate any portion of a motion, brief, pleading, or other filing must attach to the filing a separate declaration disclosing the use of AI.

What does the order require?

Practice areas: federal civil, federal criminal

Verify this order against the court's official website before relying on it. Standing orders are amended without notice. Requirements vary by judge and case type.

What the order requires

Judge Dale E. Ho’s Individual Rules for civil (§ 1.f), criminal (§ 1.e), and civil pro se (§ 8) cases, each revised January 8, 2026, require a separate declaration attached to any filing prepared with generative AI. The rule covers generative AI “such as ChatGPT, Harvey, CoCounsel, or Google Bard”; the declaration must disclose AI use and certify that the filer reviewed the source material and verified the AI-generated content (the civil and criminal versions add Rule 11 compliance). The rule states no sanction of its own.

Two design choices: (1) the disclosure must be a separate declaration, not a paragraph within the filing, and (2) the same rule runs across his civil, criminal, and pro se dockets, which is uncommon for a chambers AI rule.

Primary source

Individual Rules (criminal): https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practice_documents/DEH%20Ho%20Individual%20Rules%20and%20Practices%20in%20Criminal%20Cases%20-%20January%202026.pdf