June 1, 2026 (in 3 days): New York: 22 NYCRR Part 161 takes effect, system-wide AI policy for all UCS courts

E.D.N.Y.: Individual Rules ¶ 1.B.4: AI Caution (Cases Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dunst)

Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

active

Verified April 27, 2026

Citation
Individual Rules ¶ 1.B.4: AI Caution (Cases Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dunst)
Order date
January 1, 2025

Summary

Parties are cautioned that any use of AI resources in connection with submissions to the Court must comply with their professional obligations to the Court.

What does the order require?

Practice areas: federal civil

Verify this order against the court's official website before relying on it. Standing orders are amended without notice. Requirements vary by judge and case type.

What the order requires

Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst’s Individual Rules paragraph 1.B.4 is a Rule 11 caution paired with a citation to Benjamin v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 779 F. Supp. 3d 341 (E.D.N.Y. 2025), an in-district sanctions decision involving AI-generated false citations. The order does not require disclosure or certification; its function is to put counsel on notice of how Rule 11 will be enforced.

The reference to Benjamin is meaningful: that case is in our case tracker, and the Dunst order effectively adopts its sanctions framework as the chambers expectation.

Primary source

Individual Rules: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/pub/rules/LGD-MLR.pdf

Sanctions cases decided under this order

Cases in our tracker where this rule appears to have produced or directly informed the sanctions decision.