C.D. Cal.: Civil Standing Order (Cases Assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter)
Judge Fred W. Slaughter · U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Verified May 14, 2026
- Citation
- Civil Standing Order (Cases Assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter)
- Order date
- September 23, 2024
Summary
Any party who uses generative AI (such as ChatGPT, Harvey, CoCounsel, or Google Bard) to generate any portion of a motion, brief, pleading, or other filing must attach a separate declaration disclosing the AI use.
What does the order require?
- Any party who uses generative AI (such as ChatGPT, Harvey, CoCounsel, or Google Bard) to generate any portion of a motion, brief, pleading, or other filing must attach a separate declaration disclosing the AI use.
- The declaration must certify that the filer reviewed the source material and verified the artificially generated content is accurate.
- Verification certification is tied explicitly to the filer's Rule 11 obligations.
- Scope is limited to generative AI; trigger-document list expressly includes 'motion' (broader than the Blumenfeld/Hwang template).
Practice areas: federal civil
What the order requires
Section VIII(h) of Judge Slaughter’s civil standing order adopts the C.D. Cal. shared-template provision (also used by Blumenfeld and Hwang) and adds “motion” to the trigger-document list, broadening the rule’s reach. A party who uses generative AI to draft any portion of a motion, brief, pleading, or other filing must attach a separate declaration disclosing the AI use, certifying review of source material, and certifying verification of accuracy. Certification ties explicitly to Rule 11.
R&G data correction
R&G’s AI Court Order Tracker dates this entry 2024-10-04. The PDF on cacd.uscourts.gov is dated 2024-09-23 (filename + server Last-Modified). The 2024-09-23 date is the operative signing date.
Primary source
Civil Standing Order PDF (UPDATED 09-23-2024), apps.cacd.uscourts.gov