June 1, 2026 (in 3 days): New York: 22 NYCRR Part 161 takes effect, system-wide AI policy for all UCS courts

S.D. Tex. (Laredo Division): Court Procedures in Criminal Cases, Section 7: Use of Genera…

Judge John A. Kazen · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

active

Verified May 7, 2026

Citation
Court Procedures in Criminal Cases, Section 7: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge John A. Kazen)
Order date
June 23, 2025

Summary

Attorneys and self-represented litigants must ensure that any filing prepared with the assistance of generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or similar tools) is thoroughly reviewed for factual and legal accuracy prior to submission.

What does the order require?

Practice areas: federal criminal

Verify this order against the court's official website before relying on it. Standing orders are amended without notice. Requirements vary by judge and case type.

What the procedures require

Section 7 of Judge John A. Kazen’s Court Procedures in Criminal Cases (updated June 23, 2025) governs the use of generative AI in filings before chambers. The procedures apply alongside the S.D. Texas Local Rules and require strict compliance.

The operative requirements:

  • Attorneys and self-represented litigants must thoroughly review any filing prepared with generative AI for factual and legal accuracy before submission.
  • The Court holds filers fully accountable for content under their signature, regardless of AI involvement, and will not accept “AI prepared it” as a sanctions excuse.
  • The Court will exercise inherent authority to sanction conduct abusing the judicial process, including reliance on inaccurate or frivolous AI-generated content, citing In re Goode, 821 F.3d 553, 559 (5th Cir. 2016).
  • Attorneys are reminded of Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, particularly Rule 3.03(a) (candor to the tribunal) and Rule 1.01 cmt. 8 (technology competence).
  • The procedures expressly adopt and incorporate Chief Judge Randy Crane’s S.D. Texas General Order 2025-04 (May 7, 2025) on generative AI in court filings.

How this differs from the chambers-only standing-order template

Most chambers AI orders surveyed for this tracker either require disclosure (Baylson, Cisneros, Kang) or impose certifications (Starr, Kacsmaryk, the Texas state-district orders). Judge Kazen’s procedures take a Rule 11/inherent-authority approach: no mandatory disclosure or certification block, but explicit notice that AI involvement does not insulate counsel from sanctions, and inherent-authority enforcement is on the table.

The cross-reference to GO 2025-04 means S.D. Texas practitioners should treat the court-wide order as the floor and Judge Kazen’s procedures as the chambers-specific overlay for criminal matters in the Laredo Division.

Scope

Criminal cases assigned to Judge Kazen (Laredo Division). Civil matters before Judge Kazen are not addressed by these criminal procedures; check the corresponding civil procedures or the local rules for civil filings.

Primary source

Court Procedures in Criminal Cases (PDF, updated June 23, 2025): https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/Crim_Court_Rules_JAK_June_2025.pdf

S.D. Tex. General Order 2025-04 (incorporated by reference): https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/general-orders/General_Order_2025-04_Use_of_Generative_AI_in_Court_Filings.pdf